Conviction
(1st Vote) Edgardo Angara: I may grant CJ a plea of honest misjudgement, but given CJ's practice in law and advisory services, failure to declare amounts to culpable violation. I find the respondent Guilty.(3rd Vote) Alan Peter Cayetano: Bakit pag mahirap ang nahuli, ang sasabihin 'sa presinto ka na magpaliwanag? Pag mayaman, puro palusot. Lets be honest w each other, after 44 hours, sa tingin ko isang linggo tapos na ito, kung nagsabi na lang tayo ng totoo. If your client can't explain, I can't abstain. If you did not disclose, we have to depose. If you are not fit, you cannot sit.
(4th Vote) Pia Cayetano: It is RA 6713, Code of Conduct, that prevails. There are no exceptions. Minor inaccuracies in the SALN would not amount to betrayal of public trust. Corrections are allowed under the law. But the failure to declare $2.4M and P80M is not minor. Convict.
(6th Vote) Franklin Drilon: He has lost the moral fitness to serve the people. He cannot be Chief Justice any longer. I find the respondent Guilty.
(7th Vote) Jinggoy Ejercito-Estrada: This trial is a historic redemption of our justice system. This same process failed for my own father. Today, I join the nation in healing the wounds inflicted by this trial.
Napatunayan ng depensa na hindi 45 properties kundi lang. Hindi 82 accts kundi 4. But these numbers are irrelevant. The question is, idineklara ba ito sa tamang oras at panahon? Hindi. In my eyes, he is Guilty.
(9th Vote) Teofisto Guingona III: Ito ay isang pagbaluktot sa isang probisyon ng konstitusyon. This is constitutional perversion in its ultimate form. Ano ang aasahan nating tagapagtanggol sa SC kung mismong ang pinuno nito ang bumabaluktot sa batas? Ito ang hatol ko: ang nasasakdal ay hindi na karapat-dapat sa pagtitiwala ng sambayanang Pilipino. I vote to Convict the accused Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
(10th Vote) Gregorio Honasan II: Based on my experience, I know how it is to be deprived of due process. I know what its like to having my family maligned & lack due process, this is about judging if CJ if fit for the job. Since trial began, I have been looking for reason to acquit Corona based on compassion. Convict.
(11th Vote) Panfilo Lacson: CJ used to work at SGV, taught corporate law. I find it hard to believe his testimony he does not understand accounting. An error of judgment is inacceptible in this trial because it is final, irreversible. Convict.
(12th Vote) Lito Lapid: Bilang HS grad, anong sasabihin ko na hindi marunong mag-Ingles, hindi maalam sa batas? Ano kayang magiging desisyon? Hindi ako magsasalita ng republic act dahil hindi maniniwala ang tao sa akin. Nakinig ako sa bawat ebidensyang inaano nila dito. Yung pinrisinta ni Fariñas kahapon ay malinaw. CJ ay lumabag sa batas. Nung nagsusumbong sya dito akala ko totoo sinasabi nya. Hindi pala. Mas pinaniwalaan ko pa sinabi ni Cong Fariñas. Mas pinaniwalaan ko pa si Cong. Fariñas na nagPowerPoint dito. Pasensya na po, ang hatol ko sa inyo Guilty.
(13th Vote) Loren Legarda: I select Article 2 as the anchor of my verdict. Mahirap pong humusga sapagkat tayo ay tao lamang. Disclosure of SALN is the only window of the public to know if we have enriched ourselves while in public office. Convict.
Acquittal
(2nd Vote) Joker Arroyo: I cannot imagine removing a CJ on account of a SALN. Today, we are one step from violating the constitution, no one can stop us when we cannot stop ourselves. This is not law, it is only naked power as it was in 1972. vote to Acquit.(5th Vote) Miriam Defensor-Santiago: Kung hatulan nating may sala yan, ibig sabihin lahat tayo honest. Kung honest tayo, why is the PH always ranked as the most corrupt countries in the whole world?! Bigyan niyo ako ng isa pang buhay at iimbestigahan ko lahat dito sa House at Senado. Pati sarili ko imbestigahan ko! (Enrile interrupts) I thought I was unlimited! But I will obey the injunction. Would you be surprised if I vote not guilty?
source & image credit: http://everythinginbudget.blogspot.com/
Posted in: news
0 comments:
Post a Comment